The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Postby Racer-X » March 1st 2017, 3:22pm

Last edited by Racer-X on March 3rd 2017, 10:40pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Racer-X
Senior Member & WIS
 
Posts: 4009
Joined: June 11th 2011, 10:00pm

Re: The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Postby MKTheVintageBloke » March 1st 2017, 3:51pm

Guess it could be a bit smaller, 38-39mm would be enough, methinks...

Not quite sure about the crystal, but a domed mineral one isn't a good idea, IMO... Will gather a lot of scratches, only unlike with hesalite, Polywatch won't help.

Otherwise, a beautiful watch.
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last.
Winston Churchill

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
The Dude

Oh, cock!
James May
User avatar
MKTheVintageBloke
Master of Time
 
Posts: 887
Joined: December 7th 2016, 2:47pm

Re: The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Postby bedlam » March 1st 2017, 4:39pm

MKTheVintageBloke wrote:Guess it could be a bit smaller, 38-39mm would be enough, methinks...

Not quite sure about the crystal, but a domed mineral one isn't a good idea, IMO... Will gather a lot of scratches, only unlike with hesalite, Polywatch won't help.

Otherwise, a beautiful watch.

It's wasn't purchased as a daily wearer, so the scratch issue wouldn't loom large.

I just can't like gold on a watch anyway, but a cheap gold watch seems like an even worse idea.
"If I could put a finger on the moment we genuinely fucked ourselves, it was the moment we decided that data was something you could use words like believe or disbelieve around...

The Water Knife

Paolo Bacigalupi
User avatar
bedlam
Master of Time
 
Posts: 6938
Joined: November 12th 2011, 11:00pm
Location: Fremantle, Australia (GMT +8)

Re: The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Postby biglove » March 1st 2017, 5:24pm

bedlam wrote:
MKTheVintageBloke wrote:Guess it could be a bit smaller, 38-39mm would be enough, methinks...

Not quite sure about the crystal, but a domed mineral one isn't a good idea, IMO... Will gather a lot of scratches, only unlike with hesalite, Polywatch won't help.

Otherwise, a beautiful watch.

It's wasn't purchased as a daily wearer, so the scratch issue wouldn't loom large.

I just can't like gold on a watch anyway, but a cheap gold watch seems like an even worse idea.


Now, if the watch is solid gold, that is another story for me. Few things are sexier than a gold Rolex. Gold plate/fusion/coating/filled is another story entirely. Never looks right.
"Adults are obsolete children."-Dr. Seuss
Image
User avatar
biglove
Watchlord WIS
 
Posts: 10205
Joined: October 27th 2013, 9:18am
Location: Deep South

Re: The Collector’s View: Review of the Orient Bambino

Postby MKTheVintageBloke » March 1st 2017, 5:32pm

Well, if we're talking about gold... I tend to get a gold-plated watch when a) it's a bargain b) it's collectible. I don't think I would ever buy a contemporary gold plated watch... The Orient certainly looks nice, as I've already said, but durability-wise, I'd prefer the steel version.
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last.
Winston Churchill

Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
The Dude

Oh, cock!
James May
User avatar
MKTheVintageBloke
Master of Time
 
Posts: 887
Joined: December 7th 2016, 2:47pm


Return to Orient

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: labman and 1 guest